3 Finding Aids.
Sort by:
Page: 1
Terms
Bark peeling -- Economic aspects in subject [X]
Search
Limit by Facet
Subject
Bark peeling -- Economic aspects[X]
Bark -- Harvesting (2)
Bark peeling -- Environmental aspects (2)
Tanning -- Shenandoah River Valley (Va. and W. Va.) (2)
Account books -- Sources (1)
Bark -- Transportation -- Costs (1)
Bark -- Utilization -- Costs (1)
Bark -- Virginia -- Rockingham County (1)
Business records -- Sources (1)
Cedar Creek, Battle of, Va., 1864 (1)
Farm supply industries -- Costs (1)
Fiddling (1)
Forest products industry -- Allegheny Mountains (1)
Forests and forestry -- Economic aspects (1)
Industries -- Shenandoah River Valley (Va. and W. Va.) -- Sources (1)
Industries -- Virginia -- Rockingham County (1)
Leather industry and trade -- Virginia -- Rockingham County (1)
Log transportation (1)
Logging -- Allegheny Mountains (1)
Lumber -- Prices (1)
Lumber -- Transportation -- Prices (1)
Lumber trade -- Economic aspects -- Allegheny Mountains (1)
Lumber trade -- History -- 19th century (1)
Lumber trade -- Marketing -- 19th century (1)
Lumber trade -- Virginia (1)
Lumber trade -- West Virginia (1)
Lumbering -- Allegheny Mountains (1)
Mountain people -- Blue Ridge Mountains -- Social life and customs (1)
Railroad ties (1)
Sawmills -- Accounting -- Sources (1)
Sawmills -- Economic aspects -- Allegheny Mountains (1)
Sawmills -- Virginia (1)
Sawmills -- West Virginia (1)
Shenandoah Valley Campaign, 1862 (1)
Slavery -- Virginia -- Page County (1)
Slavery -- Virginia -- Rockingham County (1)
Southampton Insurrection, 1831 (1)
Tanneries -- Shenandoah River Valley (Va. and W. Va.) (1)
Tanneries -- Virginia -- Rockingham County (1)
Tanners -- Virginia -- Rockingham County (1)
Tanning -- Virginia -- Rockingham County (1)
Publisher
Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids. Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity. Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids

Page: 1